26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Perspectives from social economics
In: Perspectives from social economics
Atheoretical discussion and internal critique of mainstream law and economics scholarship, especially as it approaches the issue of paternalism. Cserne discusses how, and to what extent, economic analysis can explain and/or justify the limitations on freedom of contract, with special emphasis on paternalism.
In: Journal of institutional economics, Band 19, Heft 6, S. 930-943
ISSN: 1744-1382
AbstractEconomic accounts of repugnance concern two broad questions: the rationalisation of sentiments of repugnance (do emotional and visceral reactions of repugnance track valid reasons for not engaging in or condemning certain (trans)actions?) and institutional design (how to institute, regulate, or restrict markets in response to reasonable objections). If repugnance expresses valid practical reasons for regulating or limiting markets, our institutions should acknowledge and express these. If attitudes of repugnance are not rationalisable in the sense of instrumental or moral values, we should disregard or eventually counteract or reduce them. Focusing on a special case of repugnance, when commodification, i.e., the sale of goods or services for money meets societal disapproval, this paper identifies three characteristic ways to combine conceptual, empirical, and normative arguments and map repugnance into a disciplinary 'epistemic frame' of economics: repugnance as taste; repugnance as proxy for market failures or moral reasons; repugnance as hypocrisy or contingent cultural fact. Correspondingly, economists advise to (1) work around; (2) make sense of; and (3) explain away people's sentiments of repugnance.
In: TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2019-001; 'The Uneasy Case for Parsimony in (Law and) Economics: Conceptual, Empirical and Normative Arguments' Global Jurist 18 (2019) 3, 20190001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0001
SSRN
In: TILEC Discussion Paper No. DP2019-033, 24. 'Economic approaches to legal reasoning: an overview' in Economics in Legal Reasoning, ed. Péter Cserne and Fabrizio Esposito (New York: Palgrave 2020) 25–41 [Palgrave Studies in Institutions, Economics and Law] https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40168-9_3
SSRN
In: The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism, ed. Kalle Grill and Jason Hanna (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018) 293–310
SSRN
Working paper
In: European journal of risk regulation: EJRR ; at the intersection of global law, science and policy, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 278-280
ISSN: 2190-8249
In: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie: ARSP = Archives for philosophy of law and social philosophy = Archives de philosophie du droit et de philosophie sociale = Archivo de filosofía jurídica y social, Band 99, Heft 3, S. 441-445
ISSN: 2363-5614
In: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy in the 21st Century: Reassessing Legacies, ed. Miodrag Jovanović, Bojan Spaić (Frankfurt: Peter Lang 2012), pp. 71-87
SSRN
In: National Legal Systems and Globalization, S. 89-109
In: National Legal Systems and Globalization, S. 45-88
In: Review of sociology: journal of the Hungarian Sociological Association, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 69-74
ISSN: 1588-2845
In: Review of sociology: journal of the Hungarian Sociological Association, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 143-150
ISSN: 1588-2845